By David Reid: Read more

Also see this article by Popular Mechanics based on his work.

Tobias Sauerwein recently emailed me about my mapping framework Cartagen, and linked to his fantastic analysis of SVG/Canvas suitability for map rendering. Thanks!

OpenLayers with Canvas

Oh, of course, it bears mentioning this earlier comparison I dug up some months ago, which focuses on SVG/Canvas different sized rendering areas and different #s of objects.

I’ve been banging my head against a wall for a few days on this one, first struggling with ImageMagick, then switching to gdal to get full-resolution geoTIFFs from Cartagen Knitter. I had a ‘duh’ moment just now when I realized that gdalwarp can only do polynomial or thin plate spline warps, neither of which are what I want – that is, perspectival warping. I want to map 4 corner ground control points or GCPs to four latitude/longitude positions. Back to ImageMagick…

I know there are 5 GCPs in the image above – it was the same deal with just 4… it can’t do more than a shear unless you either add the minimum 6 GCPs for a single polynomial warp, or go for a thin plate spline (TPS) distort. A good way to think about TPS is as if the image were a sheet of thin metal (the reason it’s called a TPS) and that you’re bending it in the z-dimension, aplanar. This causes funny curved edges and is not what I’m looking for.

OK, one more note for future reference: see this page for a discussion of different warping techniques and also for the minimum number of GCPs required for different-order polynomial warps.

In Russia, the internet has given a boost to extreme right-wing groups like the Movement Against Illegal Immigration, which has been using Google Maps to visualise the location of ethnic minorities in Russian cities and encouraging its members to hound them out. Criminal gangs in Mexico are fond of YouTube, where they flaunt their power by uploading videos of their graphic killings. Generally, in the absence of strong democratic norms and institutions, the internet has fuelled a drive for vigilante justice rather than the social variety Miliband was expecting.

He’s writing about whether the internet can be used to promote democracy, really, not ‘good’. But I can’t help but think he’s basically arguing that the internet is a neutral force. He’s challenging pro-democracy uses and providing examples of anti-democracy uses. Isn’t he just describing a kind of information technology arms race, though? (Clay Shirky agrees, though in my opinion their debate devolves into semantic static) Is there a clear winner yet, or will there every be? Maybe we just can’t generalize this broadly. These examples were pretty interesting anyways.

And it doesn’t help that anyone with a computer and an internet connection can launch a cyber-attack on a sovereign nation. Last year I took part in one—purely for the sake of experiment—on the websites of the Georgian government. As the Russian tanks were marching into South Ossetia, I was sitting in a cafe in Berlin with a laptop and instructions culled from Russian nationalist blogs. All I had to do was to input the targets provided—the URLs of hostile Georgian institutions (curiously, the British embassy in Tbilisi was on that list)—click “Start” and sit back. I did it out of curiosity; thousands of Russians did it out of patriotism. And the Russian government turned a blind eye. The results of the attack were unclear. For a brief period some government emails and a few dozen websites were either slow or unavailable; some Georgian banks couldn’t offer online services for a short period.

Patrick Meier has also been responding to Morozov’s article, and egads, there’s been a lot of debate on this one.